Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
Head-to-head comparison of [18F]-mFBG versus [123I]-MIBG in neuroblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Domenico Albano1,2, Francesco Bertagna3,4, Arnoldo Piccardo5
1University of Brescia, Brescia, 25121, Italy. domenico.albano@unibs.it.
Abstract:
Hybrid imaging is fundamental in the staging and response assessment of patients affected by neuroblastoma (NB). [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy±single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of NB, but it presents some limitations, such as the time-consuming procedure (2 days), the low spatial resolution, and challenging interpretation. Alternative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals have been investigated to overtake the issues of [123I]-MIBG. Among them, one of the most promising seems to be meta-[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([18F]-mFBG). Thus, we planned a head-to-head systematic review and meta-analysis to compare [18F]-mFBG PET/CT and [123I]-MIBG SPECT/CT in NB. We executed a literature search to identify all articles performing a head-to-head comparison between these two methods, excluding review articles, preclinical studies, case reports, and small case series (less than 5 patients). Finally, five studies were collected for a total of 115 patients and 1,644 lesions. A patients-based analysis showed that [18F]-mFBG PET/CT had a higher pooled sensitivity than [123I]-MIBG SPECT/CT (97% vs 82%, respectively) and identical pooled specificity (82%). Also at a lesion-based analysis, [18F]-mFBG PET/CT demonstrated better sensitivity (99% vs 51.5%). In conclusion, preliminary evidence-based data demonstrate that [18F]-mFBG PET/CT showed superior diagnostic performance than [123I]-MIBG SPECT/CT. However, it is still unclear the real added value of [18F]-mFBG PET/CT compared to [123I]-MIBG SPECT/CT in the change of clinical management. These findings suggest [18F]-mFBG PET/CT may become a superior, more efficient alternative to [123I]-MIBG for staging and response assessment in neuroblastoma. Future studies should focus on its impact on clinical management and patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:44Concurrent Collection of Fetal Murine Brain and Serum to Assess Effects of Maternal Diet on Nutrition and Neurodevelopment in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Published on: May 17, 2024
09:53Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
Published on: August 16, 2020