Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Adenotonsillectomy for Children with Mild Sleep-Disordered Breathing: Who Benefits?
Ronald D Chervin1, Seyni Gueye-Ndiaye2,3, Mengqi Cen4
1Sleep Disorders Center and Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Insights
Early adenotonsillectomy (eAT) offers significant benefits for children with mild sleep-disordered breathing (MSDB) compared to watchful waiting. A high Mallampati score may predict positive outcomes, but other factors are less reliable indicators.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Sleep Medicine
- Clinical Trial Research
Background:
- Mild sleep-disordered breathing (MSDB) in children presents challenges for identifying optimal treatment.
- The Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS) evaluated early adenotonsillectomy (eAT) versus watchful waiting with supportive care (WWSC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess clinically meaningful benefits of eAT versus WWSC in children with MSDB.
- To identify predictors of treatment benefit based on baseline characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of 363 children (aged 3.0-12.9 years) from the PATS randomized clinical trial.
- Clinically meaningful benefit defined as improvement in at least two of four domains: behavior, quality of life, sleepiness, and blood pressure.
Main Results:
- A significantly higher proportion of children in the eAT group (65%) experienced meaningful improvement compared to the WWSC group (39%) (p < 0.01).
- A high Mallampati score (III or IV) was the only significant predictor of benefit (OR 4.16, p=0.027).
Conclusions:
- Early adenotonsillectomy leads to more frequent clinically meaningful improvements in children with MSDB.
- Pre-treatment clinical features, except for Mallampati score, have limited value in predicting which children will benefit from eAT.
Study Objectives:
To examine clinically-meaningful benefit that may be achieved by early adenotonsillectomy (eAT) vs. watchful waiting with supportive care (WWSC) in children with mild sleep-disordered breathing (MSDB, snoring but little or no obstructive sleep apnea), and to identify baseline demographic, symptom, physical exam, historical, or polysomnographic features that may predict such benefit.
Materials And Methods:
Secondary analysis of participants (aged 3.0-12.9 years) in the 12-month multi-center randomized clinical trial of eAT vs. WWSC for MSDB, the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS). Meaningful benefit was defined as a composite outcome of clinically-significant change in at least 2 of 4 domains - behavior, quality of life, subjective sleepiness, and blood pressure - each of which had shown greater improvement 12 months after AT versus WWSC in PATS.
Results:
Among 363 participants, the mean age was 6.6 (SD 2.3) years, 199 (55%) were > 5 years old at enrollment, and 185 (51%) were male. A total of 115 (65%) vs. 73 (39%) in the eAT vs. WWSC arms, respectively, experienced clinically-meaningful improvement on ≥2 domains (p < 0.01). Among variables explored for effect modification - including demographics, health factors, symptoms and signs, and polysomnographic data - only a high Mallampati score of III or IV vs. I or II showed predictive value (OR 4.16, 95% CI [1.22, 15.6], p = 0.027).
Conclusions:
Clinically-meaningful positive outcomes occur more often after eAT vs. WWSC for children with MSDB. However, many clinical features accessible prior to AT, with the intriguing exception of a high Mallampati score, may not help to identify which children stand to benefit.
Clinical Trial:
Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy for Snoring (PATS); HYPERLINK "https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02562040;" https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02562040; Registration number: NCT02562040.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...
Tonsillitis I: Introduction
Etiology
Three primary contributing factors have been identified.
Tonsillitis II: Management
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
