Related Experiment Videos
Determinants of cervical screening in Ghana: a systematic review
Godswill Sedinam Lanyo1, Bernard Nabe2, Abigail Opokua Tutu3
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Adult Health, University of Cape Coast College of Health and Allied Sciences, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Background:
Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women in Ghana, yet screening coverage is extremely low and organised national programmes are limited. Although several studies have examined determinants of screening, no comprehensive synthesis has summarised the evidence to guide effective policy and intervention design.
Objective:
To synthesise existing evidence on determinants of cervical screening in Ghana and identify opportunities to strengthen national screening strategies.
Design:
This is a systematic review conducted following Aromataris and Pearson's methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches across PubMed Central, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (January 2000-July 2025) identified studies reporting barriers and facilitators of cervical screening in Ghana. Risk of bias was assessed using standard appraisal tools.
Setting:
This study was conducted in the context of Ghana.
Results:
Of 7833 records screened, 32 studies met inclusion criteria. Barriers to cervical screening spanned individual, interpersonal, health system, socio-cultural and structural factors, including poor knowledge, fear, limited access, financial constraints and social norms. Facilitators included knowledge and awareness, provider recommendation, social support, positive health perceptions, healthcare access and cost-related enablers. Overall, 23 studies were rated low risk of bias, while nine were rated moderate risk of bias.
Conclusion:
Cervical screening behaviour in Ghana is influenced by structural, cultural, psychological and informational factors. The reviewed evidence suggests that these determinants do not operate in isolation but interact in ways that may vary across contexts and populations. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M4XKT.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Principles of Disease Surveillance