Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Numerical cognition in speakers of an Amazonian language with exactly twenty number words.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Language control adapts to the immediate but not to the overall language environment during language switching in production and comprehension.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

The cognitive processing of numerical bases: a review of empirical evidence.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Selective and Divided Listening in a Dual-Language Context.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Bilingual language control during single-language production: does relocation to a new linguistic environment change it?

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Naming speed during language production in younger and older adults: Examining the effects of sentence context.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Number comparison in bilinguals is not affected by their second language.

Silke M Göbel1,2, Veniamin Shiron3, Miriam Tucker3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK. silke.goebel@york.ac.uk.

Scientific Reports
|July 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Bilinguals' language background did not affect number comparison with Arabic digits. Activating either German or English did not change the compatibility effect in number comparison tasks.

Keywords:
BilingualismL2Language switchingNumber word inversionUnit-decade compatibility effect

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Language background can subtly influence numerical cognition, even when processing Arabic digits.
  • Number comparison involves a compatibility effect, where decade-unit compatibility influences response times.
  • This compatibility effect is reportedly larger in languages with number word inversion, like German.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of language background on the numerical compatibility effect in bilingual individuals.
  • To compare the compatibility effect in German monolinguals and German-English bilinguals.
  • To examine if language activation (German vs. English) affects the compatibility effect within bilinguals.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared the compatibility effect in German monolinguals and German-English bilinguals during number comparison tasks.
  • Experiment 2: German-English bilinguals performed number comparison tasks after activating either English or German by describing scenes.
  • Measured response times and accuracy to assess the compatibility effect and language switching costs.

Main Results:

  • A significant compatibility effect was observed in both monolingual and bilingual groups.
  • No significant differences in the compatibility effect were found between German monolinguals and German-English bilinguals.
  • While language switching incurred a cost, activating German or English did not significantly alter the size of the compatibility effect.

Conclusions:

  • A bilingual's language background does not appear to influence the compatibility effect in number comparison with Arabic digits.
  • Language activation within bilinguals does not modulate the magnitude of the numerical compatibility effect.
  • Arabic digit processing in number comparison tasks seems robust to language background and activation effects in bilinguals.