Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
Intraoral Ultrasound for Detection of Alveolar Bone Changes Following Periodontal Surgery: A Prospective Validity and
Background:
Alveolar bone assessment in periodontal practice relies on radiography and clinical probing, both of which have well-documented limitations in precision. Intraoral high-frequency ultrasonography (US) offers a radiation-free alternative with potential for sub-millimeter resolution, the validity and precision for detecting minute osseous changes have not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity and measurement precision of intraoral US for detecting alveolar bone-level changes in patients undergoing crown lengthening and osseous surgery, thereby enabling its translation to monitor osseous changes in patients with periodontitis.
Methods:
Ten patients (28 tooth sites) undergoing crown lengthening or osseous surgery at a USC Advanced Grad Perio clinic were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the Alveolar bone crest (ABC) was measured at pre- and post-operative time points using a 40 MHz handheld intraoral US transducer and, intraoperatively, by standardized clinical photography. Agreement was assessed by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Measurement precision was quantified using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).
Results:
Preoperative agreement between methods was excellent (r = 0.977; Bland-Altman bias = -0.009 mm; 95% limits of agreement [LoA]: ±0.40 mm). Post-operative correlation remained strong (r = 0.912; bias = 0.123 mm; LoA: -0.85 to +1.10 mm). Both methods detected statistically significant post-surgical increases in the ABC-to-CEJ distance (p < 0.001), as anticipated. US demonstrated substantially superior precision: preoperative SEM 0.058 mm with US versus 0.128 mm clinically, yielding MDC values of 0.160 mm (US) versus 0.354 mm (clinical), providing a 2.2-fold precision advantage.
Conclusions:
Intraoral US demonstrated strong concurrent validity with clinical photography and a reproducible precision advantage in detecting alveolar bone-level changes in patients with periodontitis. These findings support its clinical utility as a radiation-free, high-sensitivity bone monitoring tool. Larger longitudinal studies with CBCT validation are warranted.