Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
Pore-Throat Combination Characteristics and Their Impact on Fluid Mobility in Water-Bearing Tight Sandstones
Sha Li1, Dongxia Chen1, Zaiquan Yang1
1China University of Petroleum Beijing College of Geosciences, Beijing 102249, China.
Abstract:
The heterogeneity of nanoscale pore-throat structures controls fluid trapping and gas productivity in tight sandstone reservoirs, but a quantitative method to relate pore-throat combination to movable fluid distribution is lacking. This study integrates multiscale techniques, including high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray microcomputed tomography (Xμ-CT), and core flooding experiments to classify tight sandstone reservoirs into three types based on initial water saturation (S iw) and reveal how pore-throat size and combinations control fluid mobility. Key findings include the following: (1) LowWater-Saturation Reservoirs (LSwR, S iw <30%) exhibit large primary pores, with 20.2% of connected pores having a pore-throat radius ratio <2; MediumWater-Saturation Reservoirs (MSwR), dominated by secondary dissolution pores with complex pore-throat networks and strong heterogeneity; HighWater-Saturation Reservoirs (HSwR, S iw >60%) are dominated by nanopores (<100 nm) and high pore-throat ratios. (2) Larger pore radii and long throats reduce capillary resistance, lowering S iw. The pore-throat radius ratio governs capillary resistance via the Jamin effectlow ratios (<2) favor gas displacement, whereas high ratios (>10) cause water retention; poor pore-throat connectivity and clay minerals types are the main causes of high S iw. (3) A novel multiparameter method is developed to quantify movable fluid saturation within specific pore-size ranges, showing that >80% of movable water in LSwR resides in pores >100 nm, whereas HSwR requires high displacement pressure (>10 MPa) to mobilize only 28.12% of fluids, primarily from 1 to 100 nm pores. The heterogeneity varies among different types of reservoirs, and the heterogeneity of large pores and small pores also has different effects on the movable water saturation. The integrated framework provides a quantitative tool for predicting movable fluids and optimizing recovery in heterogeneous tight reservoirs.
Related Concept Videos
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the aggregate...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is critical—it...
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...
Capillarity in Fluid
Surface tension is crucial to capillarity. It results from cohesive forces between liquid molecules at the liquid-air boundary, forming a skin that resists external forces. When the capillary tube...
Pore Transport and Ion-Pair Transport
Pore transport, also known as convective transport, is a process where small molecules like urea, water, and sugars rapidly cross cell membranes as though there were channels or pores in the membrane. Although direct microscopic evidence is limited but the concept of pores or channels is widely accepted based on physiological evidence. Despite the lack of direct microscopic...
Characteristics of Fluids

