Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left atrial dysfunction in different morphologic phenotypes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a cardiac magnetic
Yiyuan Gao1,2, Wenqi Liu2, Zhan Feng3
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients show impaired left atrial (LA) function across subtypes. Concentric HCM exhibits more severe LA dysfunction than septal HCM, highlighting subtype-specific mechanics.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) presents diverse phenotypes, but left atrial (LA) function differences among subtypes are not well understood.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) can quantify LA deformation, but its use for subtype-specific mechanics is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate LA functional impairment in different HCM phenotypic subtypes using CMR-FT.
- To characterize subtype-specific alterations in atrial mechanics.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 225 HCM patients (septal, apical, concentric) and 68 healthy controls (HC).
- LA functional parameters (reservoir strain εs, conduit strain εe, booster strain εa) measured using CMR-FT.
- Statistical analysis including ANOVA and regression to compare LA function and correlate with left ventricular parameters.
Main Results:
- All HCM subgroups displayed significantly impaired LA strain compared to HC (P<0.05).
- Concentric HCM showed more severe LA reservoir (εs) and booster (εa) strain impairment than septal HCM (P<0.05).
- CMR-FT demonstrated excellent reproducibility for LA strain measurements (ICCs >0.75).
Conclusions:
- Left atrial dysfunction varies significantly across HCM phenotypes.
- Concentric HCM exhibits greater impairment in LA reservoir and booster function compared to septal HCM.
- CMR-FT is a valuable tool for phenotypic characterization of HCM by assessing subtype-specific atrial mechanics.
Background:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) exhibits substantial phenotypic heterogeneity; however, differences in left atrial (LA) function among morphological subtypes remain poorly characterized. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) offers advanced capabilities for quantifying LA deformation, yet its application to the evaluation of subtype-specific LA mechanics remains limited. This study aimed to investigate LA functional impairment among HCM phenotypic subtypes using CMR-FT.
Methods:
A total of 225 patients with HCM, divided into septal (n=153), apical (n=40), and concentric (n=32) subgroups, along with 68 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC), were retrospectively included from March 2023 to October 2024 at three tertiary hospitals. LA functional parameters, including reservoir strain (εs), conduit strain (εe), booster strain (εa), peak positive strain rate (SRs), peak early negative strain rate (SRe), and peak late negative strain rate (SRa), were obtained using CMR-FT. Statistical analyses included Chi-squared tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc testing, linear regression, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results:
All HCM subgroups showed impaired LA strain parameters compared to HC [(εs, %): septal: 26.69±11.02, apical: 23.47±8.16, concentric: 21.30±6.53 vs. control: 46.43±13.73; (εe, %): septal: 12.36±6.42, apical: 10.87±4.28, concentric: 9.72±4.28 vs. control: 27.88±11.15; (εa, %): septal: 14.34±6.41, apical: 12.60±4.97, concentric: 11.58±5.56 vs. control: 18.55±6.04; all P<0.05]. The concentric HCM subgroup demonstrated more severe impairment in LA εs and εa than the septal subgroup (both P<0.05). Septal HCM showed significant correlations between all LA strain parameters and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (|r|≥0.324, all P<0.001); apical HCM demonstrated correlations between LA εs, εe, and the aforementioned LV function parameters (|r|≥0.373, all P<0.05); only LA εa correlated with LVEF and LVGLS in concentric HCM (|r|≥0.389, both P<0.05). CMR-FT showed excellent reproducibility for LA strain measurements in patients with HCM (all ICCs >0.75).
Conclusions:
LA dysfunction varies across HCM phenotypes, with greater reservoir and booster impairment in concentric than septal HCM. These findings underscore the subtype-specific alterations in atrial mechanics and highlight the potential utility of CMR-FT for phenotypic characterization in HCM.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
