Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Macular Layer Thickness with Spectral-Domain and High-Resolution OCT
Sung-Uk Baek1,2, Glen P Sharpe1, Lesya M Shuba1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Objective:
The new generation high-resolution OCT (HR-OCT) offers higher axial resolution compared to standard spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). This study aimed to determine whether potential differences in the segmentation of retinal layers in the macula with the 2 techniques could lead to clinically meaningful differences with implications for monitoring progression when patients are switched to HR-OCT.
Design:
Prospective cross-sectional study.
Subjects:
This study included glaucoma patients and healthy control subjects.
Methods:
Each eye underwent SD-OCT followed by HR-OCT, with both macular scan patterns acquired at the same transverse location. Automated segmentation was applied and the thickness of 6 individual retinal layers calculated for 1024 A-scans for each of 97 B-scans. Intradevice difference was also assessed with repeated scans.
Main Outcome Measures:
Differences in retinal layer thickness measurements between SD-OCT and HR-OCT.
Results:
A total of 68 eyes (both eyes of 17 glaucoma patients and 17 healthy control subjects) underwent imaging. Mean differences in retinal layer thickness between SD-OCT and HR-OCT ranged from -2.65 to 2.02 μm. Hyper-reflective layers were thicker with SD-OCT, while hyporeflective layers were thicker with HR-OCT, showing an alternating pattern in interdevice differences in thickness measurements. Intradevice differences in thickness measurements, evaluated in a subset of 10 eyes of 5 participants, were within ± 1 μm. Image quality was not an important predictor of the interdevice thickness differences (R2 < 0.08).
Conclusions:
Interdevice differences in retinal layer thickness were small but consistent. The alternating pattern is likely due to the lower axial resolution of SD-OCT making hyper-reflective layer borders blurred and consequently thicker. For follow-up, patients can be switched to HR-OCT from SD-OCT; however, depending on the magnitude of change required for detection, the differences between the 2 techniques could potentially mask or masquerade change.
Financial Disclosures:
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Related Concept Videos
Spectroscopy of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives
In the...
Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) Infrared Spectroscopy: Overview
The ATR process begins by directing a beam...

