Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination
Published on: June 2, 2016
Misinformation, Freedom of Expression and Mandatory Vaccination
1Department of Law, Ethics & Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
In their recent book, Inducing Immunity (2024), Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij develop an account of collective immunization according to which liberal-democratic governments are sometimes justified in restricting people's freedom to refuse vaccination. In this commentary, I focus on a specific argument in the book about misinformation, freedom of expression and mandatory vaccination. Pierik and Verweij argue that, when vaccine misinformation threatens vaccination rates, governments-in order to increase or maintain vaccination rates-should consider mandatory vaccination before restricting freedom of expression. I summarize the argument and raise two issues to help advance the debate.
In their recent book, Inducing Immunity (2024), Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij develop an account of collective immunization according to which liberal-democratic governments are sometimes justified in restricting people's freedom to refuse vaccination. In this commentary, I focus on a specific argument in the book about misinformation, freedom of expression and mandatory vaccination. Pierik and Verweij argue that, when vaccine misinformation threatens vaccination rates, governments-in order to increase or maintain vaccination rates-should consider mandatory vaccination before restricting freedom of expression. I summarize the argument and raise two issues to help advance the debate.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Vaccines
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Poliomyelitis
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Groupthink

