Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
Ethical Decision-Making in the Workplace: Which Factors Influence Decision-Makers' Willingness to Revise Their
Natalie Martin1, Tobias Kopp1, Pascal Vetter1
1Institute for Learning and Innovation in Networks (ILIN), Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo examine how moral intensity and perceived trustworthiness of an AI certifier influence individuals' willingness to change their decision due to AI-generated suggestions.BackgroundAI-supported decision-making is increasingly used in professional contexts and situations with a high moral intensity. Yet it is unclear how different factors influence the willingness to base decisions on AI-generated suggestions in such situations. Perceived trustworthiness in the AI system is key for effective and ethically sound deployment. Investigating the interplay of these factors is critical for understanding AI-supported ethical decision-making and designing AI systems that support responsible decision-making in morally complex workplace environments.MethodWe conducted a 2 × 2 vignette-based online experiment with a representative US sample (n = 546), manipulating moral intensity and AI certifier trustworthiness. Participants made an initial workplace decision (whom to let go), received a deviating AI suggestion, and then made a second decision. Effects of independent and control variables on decision changes were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression and χ2-tests.ResultsDecision makers were more likely to change decisions in low moral intensity scenarios due to AI suggestions. Certifier trustworthiness had no significant effect, whereas a positive general attitude towards AI increased the likelihood of changing decisions, suggesting that overall, AI attitude may overshadow perceived certifier trustworthiness.ConclusionHuman factors play a more prominent role than AI certifications when it comes to trust-building in AI suggestions for ethical decision-making in the workplace. Further research is needed to clarify how these factors interact with perceived certifier trustworthiness and other contextual factors.ApplicationEncouraging reliance on AI-based recommendations via certifications alone is challenging. Organizations should focus on their employees' general attitudes towards AI to support AI-based ethical decision-making in the workplace. AI systems could play a significant supporting role particularly in decision situations with high moral intensity.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Halo Effect