Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
Published on: July 1, 2014
Malingering and Executive Dysfunction in Trauma Patients: Diagnostic Challenges with the M-FAST
Mesut Keskin1,2, Deniz Büyükgök2, Cüneyt Destan Cenger3
1Department of Psychiatry, Amasya Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Research and Training Hospital, Amasya, Türkiye.
Introduction:
Many people who have been exposed to trauma apply to psychiatry and forensic medicine outpatient clinics for treatment and forensic reports. These people may exaggerate their psychiatric symptoms consciously or unconsciously for various reasons. It is imperative for clinicians to comprehend this condition in the context of treatment regulation and forensic processes. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) score and clinical, sociodemographic variables and Stroop test and Block Design Test (BDT).
Methods:
The present study was conducted on a sample of patients over the age of 18 who had applied to the forensic medicine and psychiatry outpatient clinics for trauma-related reasons and had accepted to participate in the study. The patients were asked to complete Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90). M-FAST, The Stroop Test, and BDT were administered. The Stroop test and BDT were administered to assess the correlation between cognitive abilities and the M-FAST score. Those with an M-FAST score of seven or higher were considered possible malingerers. Clinician who examined the patient decided whether they were a malingerer, without knowing their M-FAST score.
Results:
All clinical and sociodemographic variables were divided into two groups (present or absent) and compared according to M-FAST scores. Prevalence of possible malingerer was determined to be 33%. Possible malingerer were more likely to be male, have psychiatric comorbidities, and show poorer executive and visuospatial functioning. M-FAST scores positively correlated with psychopathology and Stroop interference, and negatively with BDT performance. Regression and ROC analyses supported the M-FAST's fair diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.79).
Conclusion:
Unlike prior studies, our research emphasizes how cognitive functioning impacts malingering assessment in trauma-affected, treatment-seeking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to utilize M-FAST in patients seeking treatment for reasons other than forensic reasons.
Related Concept Videos
Dissociative Amnesia
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Dissociative Disorders
Dissociative Fugue
A hallmark feature of dissociative disorders is the dissociative fugue...
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events, are a...

