Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View01:27

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View01:14

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View

The superior view of the cranium shows the frontal and paired parietal bones.
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breed-specific Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries: A 14-year Retrospective Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Unlocking 3D baby face photogrammetry: Multi-view BabyMorph reconstruction from uncalibrated photographs.

Expert systems with applications·2026
Same author

Multi-Institutional Annotated Multiparametric MRI Dataset of Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Associations Between Alcohol Dehydrogenase Mutations and Cleft Lip/Palate: A Scoping Review.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026
Same author

Intraoperative Electroneurography (ENoG) of Facial Nerve Conduction during Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Robin Sequence.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Examining Sociodemographic Disparities in Diagnostic Delays and Surgical Management of Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A 10-Year Review.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Craniosynostosis From Nonsynostotic Cranial Deformities.

Can Kocabalkanli1, Bo Wu1, Mario Blondin2

  • 1PediaMetrix Inc, Rockville, MD, USA.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal : Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
|July 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning accurately identifies craniosynostosis, a premature suture fusion, and the affected suture. This tool aids pediatricians in early diagnosis, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

Keywords:
craniosynostosisimagingpediatricstelemedicine

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

A Neural Implant Design Toolbox for Nonhuman Primates
06:33

A Neural Implant Design Toolbox for Nonhuman Primates

Published on: February 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

A Neural Implant Design Toolbox for Nonhuman Primates
06:33

A Neural Implant Design Toolbox for Nonhuman Primates

Published on: February 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
  • Pediatric Surgery

Background:

  • Craniosynostosis, premature cranial suture fusion, affects 5.2/10,000 births, potentially impairing neurodevelopment.
  • Current screening lacks efficiency, leading to delayed treatment, unnecessary referrals, and increased healthcare costs.
  • Early differentiation of synostotic from nonsynostotic conditions is crucial for timely intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model for early identification of single-suture craniosynostosis.
  • To differentiate between synostotic and nonsynostotic head shapes using head volume analysis.
  • To identify the specific fused suture (metopic, sagittal, coronal, lambdoid) in affected infants.

Main Methods:

  • Head volumes were analyzed using photogrammetry or CT scans.
  • 3D point data underwent augmentation for data imbalance.
  • Statistical shape modeling, Principal Component Analysis, and an XGBoost ML model were employed.
  • Three models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation.

Main Results:

  • Model-1 achieved 97.8% accuracy in identifying craniosynostosis versus nonsynostotic conditions.
  • Model-2 demonstrated 86.1% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity in identifying the fused suture.
  • Model-3 showed 76.8% sensitivity and 97.8% specificity in classifying head shapes.

Conclusions:

  • An ML approach reliably differentiates synostotic from nonsynostotic head shapes.
  • The ML model accurately distinguishes between different types of single-suture craniosynostosis.
  • This technology can assist pediatric providers in early and accurate diagnosis of craniosynostosis.