Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026
Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Development of a Unified Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Physician Communication in Prostate Cancer Treatment
Alexander Hernandez-Tirado1, Renning Zheng2, Michael Luu3
1Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Background:
Physicians often fail to communicate important details about key risks and benefits of treatment in prostate cancer consultations, an information gap that may inhibit effective patient participation in care decisions. We developed a framework to assess detail and personalization of physician communication of key concepts, derived from observations of treatment consultations.
Methods:
We recorded and transcribed treatment consultations of 50 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer across 10 multidisciplinary providers. Using open coding, analysts identified statements related to guideline-endorsed SDM concepts and categorized the level of detail for each topic. Concept-specific hierarchies indicating increasing detail were integrated into a unified framework. We reported the highest observed level for each concept across consultations.
Results:
Across 19,388 statements, sentences addressing cancer severity (1,016; 5.2%), baseline function (186; 1.0%), oncologic endpoints (343; 1.8%), cancer prognosis (318; 1.6%), life expectancy (111; 0.57%), and treatment-related side effects (952; 4.9%) were extracted. Empirically derived frameworks for evaluating the level of detail and personalization for each concept consistently displayed parallel levels of detail. We created a unified framework, with each level providing more precise, patient-specific risk communication: (0) omission, (1) no quantification, (2) binary assessment, (3) imprecise quantification, (4) specific quantification, and (5) patient-specific estimate. The prevalence of the highest observed level of detail and personalization conveyed varied by concept, ranging from 4% to 84%, 0% to 47%, 0% to 42%, 2% to 8%, 0% to 48%, and 0% to 66% for levels 0 to 5, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our framework introduces an empirically derived, structured foundation for characterizing the level of detail and personalization of physician risk communication of key concepts in prostate cancer consultations.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
01:28Communication
Within...
01:23Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
01:25Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing process.
01:30Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...