Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
Mucociliary Clearance Following a Next-Generation Propellant Versus Hydrofluoroalkane-134a via Pressurized
Scott H Donaldson1, Kirby L Zeman1, Alan Bell2
1Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
This study found that hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze) has no clinically significant impact on mucociliary clearance (MCC) compared to hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a). This supports the transition to lower global warming potential propellants for metered-dose inhalers.
Area of Science:
- Respiratory medicine
- Environmental science
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) use propellants like HFA-134a, contributing to global warming.
- Transitioning to lower global warming potential (GWP) propellants, such as HFO-1234ze, is crucial for environmental sustainability.
- HFO-1234ze offers a 99% lower GWP than HFA-134a, supporting regulatory requirements for greener inhaler technology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of the lower-GWP propellant HFO-1234ze on mucociliary clearance (MCC) in healthy individuals.
- To compare the safety and efficacy of HFO-1234ze against the current standard propellant HFA-134a.
- To provide data supporting the registration of pMDIs utilizing HFO-1234ze.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, crossover study involving healthy participants aged 18-60.
- Participants received HFO-1234ze and HFA-134a pMDIs over two 7-day periods with a washout interval.
- Mucociliary clearance (MCC) was measured using 99mTc-labeled colloid and gamma camera imaging, assessing changes from baseline.
Main Results:
- No clinically relevant impact on MCC60 (60-minute clearance) was observed between HFO-1234ze and HFA-134a.
- A statistically significant difference was noted for MCC3h (3-hour clearance), favoring HFA-134a, though clinical relevance requires further evaluation.
- No unexpected safety or tolerability issues were identified for HFO-1234ze.
Conclusions:
- HFO-1234ze demonstrates comparable safety and no clinically relevant impact on mucociliary clearance versus HFA-134a in healthy subjects.
- This finding supports the use of HFO-1234ze as a sustainable alternative propellant in pMDIs.
- Further research may explore long-term effects and patient populations with respiratory diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Inhaled Medications
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by anesthetizing...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease III: Chronic Bronchitis Features
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation

