Related Experiment Videos
Age-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a
Francisco Vara-Luiz1,2, Carolina Palma1,2, Paulo Mascarenhas2
1Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Unidade Local de Saúde Almada-Seixal, Almada, Portugal.
Background:
Population ageing in Europe is reshaping the clinical profile and outcomes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), but age-related comparative data remain scarce. We aimed to compare clinical presentation, management and 30-day outcomes between older and younger adults with LGIB.
Methods:
This retrospective, multinational, cohort study included consecutive adults presenting to emergency departments with LGIB between January 1 and December 31 in 2024. European hospitals routinely managing LGIB were eligible to participate. Ethical approval was obtained at hospital level. Patients were categorised in two age groups (≥65 and <65 years). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.
Findings:
Overall, 1058 patients from 11 centres in seven European countries were included. Of these, 77.3% (818/1058) were aged ≥65 years and demonstrated a higher Oakland (21.0 ± 7.15), ABC (4.0 ± 2.9), and ALIBI (8.94 ± 3.7) scores, and a higher transfusion rate (50.9%, 416/818). Aetiology differed by age, with anorectal and inflammatory bowel diseases more common in younger adults and diverticular bleeding predominating in older patients. Endoscopy was performed in most patients (84.9%, 899/1058) and the rates of endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology, and surgery were similar across groups. Overall, 30-day mortality was 11.7% (124/1058) and was higher in older adults (13.7%, 112/818 versus 5.0%, 12/240), mainly due to non-bleeding-related causes (89.3%, 100/112). In multivariable analyses, ALIBI score (OR = 1.26 per-point, 95% CI 1.14-1.39), ABC score (OR = 1.25 per-point, 95% CI 1.15-1.36), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR = 1.25 per-point, 95% CI 1.14-1.37) were independently associated with 30-day mortality (p < 0.001). Age was inversely associated with intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.95 per-year, 95% CI 0.92-0.98; p = 0.0028).
Interpretation:
LGIB in older adults presents distinct clinical features with more severe bleeding. Higher baseline vulnerability might explain the age-related differences in escalation of care and worse outcomes. This supports the need for better integrated pathways of care in ageing European populations.
Funding:
FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
01:23Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
01:25Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
01:17Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.