Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

09:52
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Imaging suspected posterior circulation stroke in the emergency department: a practical modality-based review
Allison Peng1, Mahsa Mayeli1, Julian Sison1
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Emergency Radiology
|July 19, 2026
Summary
Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) is often missed. This review details imaging for suspected PCS in the emergency department, highlighting MRI
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) constitutes 20-25% of ischemic strokes.
- PCS is frequently misdiagnosed upon initial presentation in the emergency department (ED).
- Effective diagnosis relies on appropriate neuroimaging selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review established and emerging brain parenchymal and neurovascular imaging modalities for suspected PCS in the ED.
- To describe the technical principles, clinical roles, performance, limitations, and applications of each imaging modality.
Main Methods:
- Structured narrative review of imaging modalities for PCS evaluation.
- Prioritization of studies focusing on ED populations, posterior fossa infarction, society guidelines, and meta-analyses.
- Analysis of performance estimates, evidence base, and limitations for each modality.
Main Results:
- Non-contrast CT is insensitive for PCS (16-44%) but vital for excluding hemorrhage.
- CT angiography shows ~80% sensitivity for vertebrobasilar occlusion but only ~44% for overall PCS.
- MRI with DWI offers ~80% sensitivity, with high-resolution DWI approaching 90-95%; emerging modalities show variable sensitivity.
- Dual-energy CT (41-88%), portable low-field MRI (~69%), and accelerated MRI (80-95%) are under development.
- Performance data for novel techniques often stem from small, single-center studies with potential bias.
Conclusions:
- Diagnosing PCS requires careful selection and often a combination of imaging modalities.
- Imaging should be tailored to the specific clinical question (parenchyma vs. vasculature) and available resources.
- Further validation of emerging imaging techniques in larger cohorts is necessary.

