Related Experiment Videos
Temporal Trends and Predictors of Access Site Crossover During PCI in Contemporary Practice: A Report From the NCDR
Eli Reynolds1, Binita Shah2, Angel Marks3
1Department of Internal Medicine (E.R.), New York University Langone Health.
Insights
Vascular access site crossover during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common, especially with radial access. Operator experience significantly impacts crossover rates, with lower-volume operators experiencing more events, indicating a learning curve for radial access.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- Randomized trials report variable crossover rates between radial and femoral access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Real-world contemporary crossover rates require further characterization.
- Understanding these trends is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate current trends in vascular access site crossover during PCI.
- To identify clinical predictors associated with access site crossover.
- To assess the impact of operator experience on crossover rates.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3,861,790 index PCI procedures from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry (2018-2024).
- Identification of access site crossover using documented access data, with radial-to-femoral crossover inferred.
- Examination of temporal trends and clinical predictors, including operator experience based on PCI volumes.
Main Results:
- 5.0% of PCIs involved access site crossover, showing a modest increase over time.
- Radial-to-femoral crossover constituted 81.2% of all crossover events.
- Older age, female sex, higher BMI, peripheral vascular disease, and lower operator PCI/radial PCI volume were associated with increased crossover.
Conclusions:
- Contemporary real-world access site crossover rates align with randomized trial findings.
- Lower-volume operators experience higher crossover rates, suggesting a learning curve for radial access.
- Increasing operator experience correlates with improved procedural performance and reduced crossover rates.
Background:
Randomized trials comparing radial and femoral access report access site crossover rates of 3% to 9% for radial access and 1% to 3% for femoral access. However, contemporary real-world crossover rates are not well characterized. The aim was to evaluate contemporary trends and predictors of vascular access site crossover during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
We analyzed index PCI procedures recorded in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry from 2018 to 2024. Access site crossover was identified using documented access data, with radial-to-femoral crossover inferred when the final successful access site was femoral. Temporal trends and clinical predictors of crossover were examined. Operator experience was assessed using cumulative total and radial PCI volumes from 2011 to 2024 as captured in CathPCI Registry versions 4 and 5.
Results:
Among 3 861 790 index PCIs, 192 902 (5.0%) involved access site crossover, with a modest increase over time. Radial-to-femoral crossover accounted for 81.2% of crossover events. Factors independently associated with crossover included older age, female sex, higher body mass index, and peripheral vascular disease. Operators with the lowest total PCI volume and the lowest radial PCI volume experienced the highest crossover rates. Notably, operators with low radial PCI volume demonstrated a substantial decline in radial-to-femoral crossover over the study period.
Conclusions:
In contemporary clinical practice, access site crossover rates are consistent with those reported in randomized trials. Although crossover occurs more frequently among lower-volume operators, rates decline with increasing operator experience, supporting the presence of a radial access learning curve and improvement in procedural performance over time.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview