Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Partisan differences in healthcare decision-making: Evidence from a vaccine experiment
Brandyn F Churchill1, Xiaoxue Sherry Gao2, Rong Rong2
1Department of Public Administration & Policy, American University, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Abstract:
Policymakers use information campaigns to alter health behaviors, but their effectiveness depends on how the information compares to viewers' initial beliefs and their perceptions of its value. In August 2024, we experimentally tested whether political identity influenced how individuals responded to information about the COVID-19 vaccine. Our sample included 288 self-identified Democrats and 291 self-identified Republicans. We found that Democrats and Republicans similarly overestimated the frequency and severity of COVID-19 infections, as well as the vaccination rate. Participants were not better at predicting the COVID-19 experiences of their concordant party. However, participants who learned they underestimated the discordant party vaccination rate were more likely to report an intent to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
Related Concept Videos
What is an Experiment?
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
