Combined quantitative-anatomical assessment of metastatic lymph nodes refines prognostic stratification in resected gastric cancer
Cristina Díaz Del Arco1, M Jesús Fernández Aceñero1, Andrés Sánchez Pernaute2
1Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Background:
Lymph node (LN) status is a cornerstone of gastric cancer (GC) staging. Current AJCC/UICC TNM nodal categories are primarily numerical, but whether integrating anatomical distribution with quantitative nodal burden provides additional prognostic information remains uncertain, particularly in Western cohorts.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 249 patients who underwent upfront curative-intent surgery for GC at a single tertiary center in Spain (2001-2019). Metastatic LNs were classified as perigastric (stations 1-6) or extraperigastric (stations 7-12). Disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Interaction between LN location and nodal burden (lymph node ratio, LNR) was evaluated, and a combined quantitative-anatomical nodal classification was explored.
Results:
LN metastases were present in 56.6% of patients; 38.3% of node-positive patients had extraperigastric metastases. In N+ patients, extraperigastric involvement was associated with worse DFS and CSS and remained independently prognostic in multivariable models. LN location showed a significant interaction with LNR for CSS (Loc×LNR HR 2.64; p < 0.001), indicating increasing adverse impact of extraperigastric metastases with higher nodal burden. The prognostic value of LN location was most evident in pN3 disease (n = 51), where it was the only independent factor for DFS (HR 3.166) and CSS (HR 3.240). A combined LNR-location classification further stratified prognosis and identified a high-risk subgroup (LNR>25% with extraperigastric metastases).
Conclusions:
Metastatic LN location provides prognostic information beyond numerical staging, particularly in advanced nodal disease. Integrating quantitative and anatomical nodal assessment may refine prognostic stratification and identify patients with high-risk disease.

