Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Longitudinal In Vivo Imaging of the Cerebrovasculature: Relevance to CNS Diseases
Published on: December 6, 2016
Moving on in hydrocephalus imaging: from 2D to 3D biomarkers
Raffaele Da Mutten1,2, Rafael Turczynski Holmgren3,4, Erik Edström5,6
1Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Purpose:
Linear two-dimensional indices such as the Evans index, callosal angle, and fronto-occipital horn ratio remain the clinical standard for hydrocephalus assessment, yet are limited by measurement variability, insensitivity to spatial CSF redistribution, and reduced sensitivity to volumetric change over time. This narrative review aims to summarize established two-dimensional indices, their structural limitations, and describe how automated segmentation and radiomic feature extraction enable three-dimensional assessment across four clinical domains.
Methods:
A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed. Studies addressing hydrocephalus imaging biomarkers, ventricular volumetry, automated segmentation, radiomics, and machine learning applications were reviewed. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional sources. The literature was synthesized across four clinical domains: pediatric hydrocephalus monitoring, differential diagnosis of ventriculomegaly, preoperative prediction of response to cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and longitudinal post-treatment follow-up.
Results:
Across pediatric hydrocephalus monitoring, differential diagnosis of ventriculomegaly, preoperative prediction of response to CSF diversion, and post-shunt longitudinal follow-up, three-dimensional volumetric and radiomic approaches consistently outperform linear indices. Machine learning models report AUCs exceeding 0.9 for differential diagnosis and shunt response prediction. Automated segmentation has reached excellent performance for detection tasks, and volumetry is more sensitive to postoperative change than the Evans index.
Conclusions:
Despite strong metric performance, clinical translation remains limited by small single-centre datasets, missing external validation, and undefined thresholds for clinically meaningful volumetric change. Embedding validated tools into radiological workflows and clinical guidelines will be essential before three-dimensional biomarkers can improve routine hydrocephalus care.
More Related Videos
10:143D Scanning Technology Bridging Microcircuits and Macroscale Brain Images in 3D Novel Embedding Overlapping Protocol
Published on: May 12, 2019
09:06Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
Published on: June 9, 2018