Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Exploring the Radical Nature of a Carbon Surface by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and a Calibrated Gas Flow
Published on: April 24, 2014
Oxidation method affects radiocarbon analysis of natural solid samples: Implications for elemental analyzer vs.
Seung-Cheol Lee1, Gwan-Ho Lee2, Hyunshin Koh3
1Environmental Planning Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Radiocarbon dating relies on elemental analyzer combustion (EAC) and closed tube combustion (CTC) sample preparation. While generally agreeing, these methods show significant differences for low-carbon environmental samples.
Area of Science:
- Geochemistry
- Environmental Science
- Archaeology
- Marine Science
Background:
- Radiocarbon analysis is crucial for dating in environmental studies, archaeology, geochemistry, and marine science.
- Elemental analyzer combustion (EAC) and closed tube combustion (CTC) are standard methods for preparing solid samples for 14C analysis.
- A direct comparison of EAC and CTC using diverse environmental samples is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of elemental analyzer combustion (EAC) and closed tube combustion (CTC) methods for radiocarbon analysis.
- To evaluate the agreement between EAC and CTC across various environmental sample types.
- To identify conditions where discrepancies between the two methods may arise.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of fraction modern (F14C) values obtained from EAC and CTC.
- Analysis of diverse environmental matrices with varying carbon concentrations.
- Statistical evaluation of agreement and discrepancies between the two methods.
Main Results:
- Both EAC and CTC methods yielded comparable F14C values for most environmental samples.
- A significant discrepancy (up to 30%) in F14C values was observed for samples with low carbon concentration (<1% by weight).
- Methodological differences, particularly combustion time, may influence results for heat-resistant organic matter.
Conclusions:
- While EAC and CTC are largely comparable, method selection is critical for low-carbon environmental samples.
- The prolonged combustion in CTC might be advantageous for complete oxidation of recalcitrant organic matter.
- Further investigation is warranted, especially considering the increasing use of automated EAC in radiocarbon laboratories.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
Radioactive Decay and Radiometric Dating
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab

