Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Automated planning in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Impact analysis on patient workflows
Varsha Hande1, Linda Rossi2, Henrike Westerveld2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Purpose:
Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) improves outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer, but remains resource- and time-intensive, particularly during treatment planning. This study evaluated the impact of automated IGABT treatment planning using a validated model (BiCycle) on workflow optimization and improved planning efficiency.
Material And Methods:
This study analyzed IGABT planning data collected from Institution 1 (India) and Institution 2 (the Netherlands) between January 2022 and July 2024. Intracavitary (IC) and intracavitary + interstitial (IC + IS) implants planned with 3D CT/MRI imaging were employed. Once the target and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated and the applicator was reconstructed, manual and automated planning times (in minutes) for dwell time optimization and dwell time adjustment (fine-tuning) were compared. Mann-Whitney U test evaluated differences in median time. Time savings with automated brachytherapy planning were modelled as increased treatment capacity.
Results:
Sixty-nine plans from both institutions were analyzed, consisting of 30 automated and 39 manual plans. The median time for dwell time position selection and optimization was 4.59 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.00-5.90) using automated planning, and 21 minutes (IQR: 12.00-30.00) using manual planning. The median time for treatment dwell time adjustment was 5 minutes (IQR: 3.46-8.50) using automated planning, and 15 minutes (IQR: 11.00-24.00) using manual planning. In high-volume centers treating up to four patients daily, automation could save as much as two hours daily and enhance treatment capacity by 25%.
Conclusions:
Automating IGABT treatment planning significantly reduces planning time and improve efficiency.
More Related Videos
05:18Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources
Published on: October 6, 2023
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022