Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
Published on: December 15, 2023
Psychosocial-Behavioural Phenotypes and Temporomandibular Disorder Risk: Insights From a Latent Class Analysis in
Adrian Ujin Yap1,2,3, Abd Aziz Alias4, Siew Wui Chan5
1Division of Dentistry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Centre for Oral Health, and Faculty of Dentistry, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Background:
Psychosocial and behavioural factors shape temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), yet integrated phenotyping in Southeast Asian young adults remains limited. University students, a vulnerable subgroup of young adults, face heightened risk.
Objectives:
To identify latent psychosocial-behavioural classes in this cohort and assess associations with sociodemographic factors and TMD severity.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study of participants aged 18-30 years used validated instruments to assess distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-4; PHQ-4), somatic symptoms (PHQ-15), oral behaviours (Oral Behaviours Checklist; OBC), and TMDs (Short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index; SFAI). Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on PHQ-4, PHQ-15, and OBC scores, estimating one- to five-class models. Class differences were tested using χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's procedures. Predictors of class membership were evaluated using multinomial logistic regression (α = 0.05).
Results:
Three classes emerged: Resilient (56.1%), Moderate-Vulnerability (30.4%), and High-Risk (13.5%). TMD prevalence was highest in High-Risk (45.0%), intermediate in Moderate-Vulnerability (25.6%), and lowest in Resilient (10.0%). Depression (OR = 12.34), anxiety (OR = 13.03), somatic burden (OR = 4.91), and oral behaviours (sleeping-state OR = 1.77; waking-state non-functional OR = 1.70; waking-state functional OR = 1.44) significantly predicted High-Risk membership. Sociodemographic factors and TMD severity differentiated classes descriptively but lacked predictive strength.
Conclusion:
LCA delineated three psychosocial-behavioural phenotypes, with depression, anxiety, and somatic burden most strongly defining High-Risk membership, and oral behaviours adding incremental risk. Findings underscore upstream psychosocial-behavioural determinants as key prevention targets, while downstream outcomes guide tailored interventions in young adults.
Related Concept Videos
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Conduct Disorder
Social Anxiety Disorder
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
