Chest compression synchronized ventilation versus chest compression asynchronized ventilation in asphyxiated

Shrieya Praveen1, Megan O'Reilly1,2, Raza Hyderi1

  • 1Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Pediatric Research
|July 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) did not improve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in piglets compared to asynchronous ventilation (CCaV). This study found no significant difference in ROSC time or rates between the two ventilation methods.

Related Concept Videos