Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Single Cell Collection of Trophoblast Cells in Peri-implantation Stage Human Embryos
Published on: June 12, 2020
Extended embryo culture and cumulative live birth in patients with limited embryos
Huizi Jin1,2, Wenju Peng3, Jiejun Luo1
1Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose:
Among IVF/ICSI patients with only 2-4 Day 3 embryos, which embryo culture strategy is associated with the highest cumulative live birth rate (CLBR): cleavage-stage transfer, blastocyst-stage transfer, or a mixed strategy?
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 5758 first IVF/ICSI cycles performed between January 2016 and May 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to embryo culture strategy: cleavage group (all embryos transferred/frozen at Day 3, n = 1859), blastocyst group (all embryos cultured to Day 5, n = 529), and mixed group (1-2 best cleavage embryos transferred or cryopreserved, with the remainder cultured, n = 3370). The primary outcome was CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle. Confounders were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression. In addition, a doubly robust approach combining inverse probability weighting (IPW) with regression adjustment was performed as a sensitivity analysis.
Results:
Compared with the cleavage-stage group, the blastocyst-stage group had a significantly lower CLBR after one oocyte retrieval cycle (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.243, 95% CI 0.185-0.319 in logistic regression; aOR 0.345, 95% CI 0.271-0.437 in IPW). In contrast, the mixed group showed no significant difference in CLBR after adjustment (aOR 0.924, 95% CI 0.795-1.075 in logistic regression; aOR 0.978, 95% CI 0.867-1.103 in IPW).
Conclusions:
For IVF patients with limited Day 3 embryos, a full blastocyst-stage strategy was associated with a substantially lower cumulative chance of live birth, whereas a mixed strategy did not improve CLBR compared with the cleavage-stage strategy after adjustment. These findings suggest that preserving transfer opportunities may be more important than further in vitro selection in this population.

