Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Intramyocardial Cell Delivery: Observations in Murine Hearts
Published on: January 24, 2014
Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary Mesenchymal Stem Cell Administration in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial
Kaiming Chen1, Shijie Zhao2, Xiaoqian Zou3
1Department of Cardiology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Insights
Intracoronary mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy modestly improved left ventricular function in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, MSCs did not significantly reduce clinical events like heart failure rehospitalization or mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death.
- Current therapies may not fully prevent myocardial injury and adverse ventricular remodeling.
- Intracoronary mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is explored for STEMI, but evidence is inconsistent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intracoronary MSC administration versus standard care in STEMI patients.
- To assess the impact of MSCs on left ventricular function and clinical outcomes.
- To identify safety signals associated with MSC therapy in STEMI.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
- Searched databases from inception through February 2026.
- Included seven trials with 400 patients for quantitative analysis after excluding one study under Expression of Concern.
Main Results:
- MSC administration significantly improved ΔLVEF (WMD = 3.18, p < 0.001).
- No significant differences were found in rehospitalization for heart failure (RR = 1.14, p = 0.831), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.51, p = 0.659), or MACE (RR = 2.47, p = 0.236).
- No major safety signal was identified, but safety data remain limited.
Conclusions:
- Intracoronary MSC administration after STEMI offers a modest improvement in left ventricular function.
- Current evidence does not support a reduction in major clinical events with MSC therapy.
- Larger, well-designed trials with longer follow-up are necessary to confirm efficacy and safety.
Abstract:
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a major cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite advances in reperfusion therapy, many patients still develop irreversible myocardial injury and adverse ventricular remodeling. Intracoronary mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) administration has been investigated as a potential therapeutic approach, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intracoronary MSC administration with standard care in STEMI patients. Databases were searched from inception through February 2026. Eight RCTs involving 796 patients were identified, and seven trials with 400 patients were included in the quantitative analysis after excluding one study under Expression of Concern. MSC administration significantly improved ΔLVEF (I2 = 44.6%, p = 0.108; WMD = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.52-4.83, p < 0.001). No significant differences were detected in rehospitalization for heart failure (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.592; RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.36-3.61, p = 0.831), all-cause mortality (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.525; RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.24-9.31, p = 0.659), or MACE (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.887; RR = 2.47, 95% CI: 0.55-11.05, p = 0.236). Intracoronary MSC administration after STEMI is associated with a modest improvement in left ventricular function, while no reduction in clinical events was found. No major safety signal was identified, although available safety data remain limited. Larger and well-designed trials with longer follow-up are still needed. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD420261286620.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Mesenchymal Stem Cells

