Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Implants in Adolescents: Clinical Outcomes After Growth-Pattern-Adapted Implant Placement
Felix Tetsch1,2,3, Milan Stoilov1,4, Dominik Kraus1,4
1Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
|July 27, 2026
Summary
Dental implants in adolescents are feasible using a growth-pattern-adapted approach, showing high survival rates, excellent esthetics, and patient satisfaction. This method supports anterior maxillary implant placement during adolescence.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Surgery
- Orthodontics
Background:
- Dental implants in adolescents are controversial due to ongoing facial growth.
- A growth-pattern-adapted concept aims to mitigate esthetic and functional issues.
- This study evaluates implants placed during adolescence with a focus on esthetics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the esthetic outcome of dental implants placed in adolescents using a growth-pattern-adapted concept.
- To assess secondary outcomes including implant survival, peri-implant health, and patient satisfaction.
- To determine the feasibility of anterior maxillary implant placement during adolescence.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 305 patients (612 implants) for primary survival.
- Clinical re-examination of 68 anterior maxillary implants in 50 patients (mean age 16.2 years).
- Assessment of esthetic outcomes using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and evaluation of vertical discrepancies.
Main Results:
- Overall primary implant survival was 93.8% (97.7% for tooth loss, 92.3% for agenesis).
- No cases of peri-implantitis were observed in the follow-up cohort, with high patient satisfaction.
- Favorable esthetic outcomes (PES: 12.0 ± 1.1) were noted, though vertical discrepancies occurred in 41.2% of implants.
Conclusions:
- The growth-pattern-adapted implant placement met esthetic thresholds in adolescents.
- High primary implant survival, stable peri-implant health, and patient satisfaction support this approach.
- Feasibility of anterior maxillary implant placement during adolescence is supported by these findings.
