Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

An Improved and High Throughput Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Micro-neutralization Assay
Published on: January 26, 2019
RSV Immunoprophylaxis in Infants and Children: Old Standards, New Agents and the Complexities Therein
Bosco A Paes1, Paolo Manzoni2,3, John R Fullarton4
1Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Insights
New long-acting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) like nirsevimab and clesrovimab offer single-dose protection against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for infants, complementing existing options. These advanced immunoprophylaxis strategies are changing infant immunization programs.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Immunology
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant lower respiratory tract infections, hospitalizations, and mortality in young children globally.
- Palivizumab, a monthly monoclonal antibody (mAb), has been the standard for RSV immunoprophylaxis in high-risk infants for 28 years.
- Recent advancements include long-acting mAbs (nirsevimab, clesrovimab) and a maternal preF vaccine, transforming RSV prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of nirsevimab and clesrovimab.
- To use palivizumab as a reference standard for evaluating these newer RSV prevention agents.
- To assess the impact of these new immunoprophylaxis options on universal infant immunization programs.
Main Methods:
- Comparative review of nirsevimab and clesrovimab against palivizumab.
- Analysis of data from clinical trials, considering variations in study populations and endpoint definitions.
- Evaluation of real-world evidence for nirsevimab and assessment of data gaps for clesrovimab.
Main Results:
- Nirsevimab and clesrovimab offer single-dose seasonal protection, enabling broader infant populations for immunization compared to palivizumab.
- All three agents (palivizumab, nirsevimab, clesrovimab) demonstrate broadly comparable protection against severe RSV disease and favorable tolerability profiles.
- Nirsevimab has growing real-world evidence supporting its effectiveness, while clesrovimab requires further real-world data, especially in high-risk groups.
Conclusions:
- Nirsevimab and clesrovimab show equivalent efficacy and safety profiles to palivizumab.
- The choice between these monoclonal antibodies should be guided by cost-effectiveness and local availability.
- Optimal integration of infant immunoprophylaxis with maternal RSV vaccination programs should be considered.
Abstract:
Every year, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an estimated 33 million lower respiratory tract infections in children under five years of age, driving millions of hospitalizations worldwide and substantial mortality in developing countries. For 28 years, the monoclonal antibody (mAb) palivizumab has been the principal agent for RSV immunoprophylaxis, reducing hospitalization in defined high-risk groups through monthly intramuscular dosing. The recent approval of two second-generation long-acting mAbs, nirsevimab and clesrovimab, and maternal preF vaccine has fundamentally changed the RSV prevention landscape. In contrast to palivizumab, the long-acting mAbs offer single-dose seasonal protection across a broader infant population, enabling universal immunization programmes for the first time. In this review, we conjointly examine nirsevimab and clesrovimab across their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness, using palivizumab as the reference standard. Cross-trial efficacy comparisons are complicated by differences in study populations and endpoint definitions; however, when these factors are considered, the available evidence suggests that all three agents offer broadly comparable protection against severe RSV disease. All three agents also demonstrate favourable and comparable tolerability profiles. Nirsevimab is now supported by a substantial body of real-world evidence confirming effectiveness in routine immunization programmes that closely align with registrational studies. Clesrovimab, as the newest agent, currently lacks real-world effectiveness, and both long-acting monoclonals require further confirmatory evidence in high-risk groups. Overall, existing data support that both monoclonals have equivalent efficacy and safety profiles as palivizumab, and choice should be based on cost-effectiveness and local availability, with consideration given to optimal integration of infant immunoprophylaxis alongside maternal RSV vaccination programmes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Smallpox
Poliomyelitis
Vaccinations
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:

