Effects of Resisted Versus Non-Resisted Sprint Training on Countermovement Jump and Sprint Force-Velocity Profile in...

In youth football, sprint performance depends on the capacity to produce and orient force horizontally during acceleration. Resisted sprinting may preferentially target the force end of the sprint force-velocity profile, whereas free sprinting may favour velocity-oriented adaptations.

To compare the effects of resisted versus non-resisted sprint training on sprint performance and sprint force-velocity variables in youth footballers, while monitoring countermovement jump (CMJ) as a secondary outcome.

This parallel-group randomised controlled trial included 44 players from two age categories (U14, n = 21; Youth, n = 23). Within each category, players were randomly allocated to resisted sprint training (RST; U14 n = 11, Youth n = 12) or non-resisted sprint training (NRST; U14 n = 10, Youth n = 11). Both groups completed two supervised sessions per week for six weeks. Outcomes were CMJ and sprint-derived variables including maximal theoretical horizontal force (F0), maximal theoretical velocity (V0), maximal power (Pmax), measured maximal sprint velocity (Vmax), peak ratio of horizontal force (RFpeak), decrease in RF with increasing velocity (DRF), and force-velocity slope (FV).

CMJ remained essentially unchanged in both age categories. Sprint performance improved over time, with the pattern of adaptation generally favouring RST for force-oriented sprint mechanical variables (F0, Pmax and RFpeak), whereas improvements in Vmax were observed in both groups. In the Youth category, the FV slope differed between groups post-test (p = 0.002). Overall, resisted sprint training tended to produce larger improvements in acceleration-oriented mechanical qualities, while non-resisted sprint training was associated with more velocity-oriented adaptations.

Low-volume resisted sprint training using a sled load of ~20% body mass was associated with more favourable adaptations in force-oriented sprint mechanical variables, whereas non-resisted sprint training tended to favour velocity-oriented characteristics. CMJ performance remained unchanged in both groups. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small age-stratified subgroup sizes and the single-club nature of the study.

This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07418892).