Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
Inter-Vendor Variability of Perfusion Parameters Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Prostate
Mingyu Kim1, Seung Ho Kim1, Joo Yeon Kim2
1Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
Perfusion parameters from two dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI solutions showed significant differences in prostate cancer patients. Comparing these parameters across different solutions is not recommended due to poor agreement.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Imaging Science
- Oncology and Cancer Research
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) is crucial for assessing prostate cancer (PCa) characteristics.
- Perfusion parameters derived from DCE-MRI, such as Ktrans, kep, ve, and vp, provide insights into tumor vascularity and permeability.
- The variability in perfusion parameter quantification across different commercial software solutions necessitates investigation into their agreement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement of perfusion parameters calculated using two distinct commercial DCE-MRI software solutions.
- To assess the reproducibility and comparability of key perfusion metrics (Ktrans, kep, ve, vp) in prostate cancer patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of DCE-MRI data from 50 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.
- Tumor segmentation performed by consensus of two radiologists following radiologic-pathologic correlation.
- Calculation of four perfusion parameters using two different commercial solutions, both employing an extended Tofts model and population-based arterial input function.
Main Results:
- Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed for all calculated perfusion parameters (Ktrans, kep, ve, vp) between the two solutions.
- Mean differences ranged from -0.029 (vp) to -0.763 (kep), indicating systematic discrepancies.
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for average measures showed poor to moderate agreement, with values ranging from -0.133 (ve) to 0.688 (kep).
Conclusions:
- The two commercial DCE-MRI solutions yield significantly different perfusion parameter values for prostate cancer.
- The observed discrepancies and poor agreement suggest that direct comparison of perfusion parameters across these solutions is not advisable.
- Clinical interpretation and treatment decisions based on DCE-MRI perfusion parameters require careful consideration of the software solution used.
More Related Videos
10:25A Dorsal Skinfold Window Chamber Tumor Mouse Model for Combined Intravital Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Translational Cancer Research
Published on: April 12, 2024
06:24Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015