Related Experiment Videos
Artificial Intelligence in Spiritual Care: Modified Delphi Study
Fabian Winiger1, C Estelle Smith2, Shadi Nourriz2
1URPP Digital Religion(s), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
|July 27, 2026
Summary
Spiritual care experts see artificial intelligence (AI) as beneficial for administrative and research tasks, but not for direct patient care. Guidance on AI implementation is achievable, focusing on practical safeguards and competencies.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Ethics
- Digital Health
- Spiritual Care
Background:
- Spiritual care providers face challenges integrating artificial intelligence (AI) within ethical and religious frameworks.
- Limited empirical data exists on professional perspectives regarding AI in spiritual care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate AI use cases, risks, benefits, and ethical considerations in spiritual care from a multistakeholder expert viewpoint.
- To identify essential professional competencies for AI implementation in spiritual care.
Main Methods:
- A two-round international, multistakeholder modified Delphi study.
- 149 subject experts rated 213 items on AI assistance, risks, ethics, and competencies.
- Consensus was determined using variance and directionality measures; subgroup analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- Strong agreement that AI can assist with administrative, informational, documentation, and research tasks (95.1% to 83.8%).
- Lower agreement for AI in patient-facing relational tasks (43.5% to 42.1%).
- Experts favored AI assistance over substitution, viewing AI's future potential higher than current capabilities. Improved screening/triage was the top benefit; loss of human connection was the top risk.
Conclusions:
- Expert views on AI in spiritual care are task-specific, future-oriented, and conditional.
- AI is suitable for administrative and research support, while direct relational care remains a human responsibility.
- Consensus exists on practical safeguards and competencies for AI implementation, despite ongoing ethical and theological debates.