Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
A taxonomy of errors for pediatric emergency intubation
Anne Runkle1, Sara Helwig2, Sarah Chen2
1Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 376 W 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201, USA.
Insights
This study adapted an adult airway error classification system for pediatric intubations, identifying common errors like suboptimal views and inadequate lifting. This system aids quality assurance and trainee education in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Airway Management
- Medical Simulation & Training
Background:
- Pediatric intubation presents unique challenges compared to adults.
- A structured system for classifying intubation errors is needed for quality assurance in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED).
- Existing adult airway literature provides a foundation for video laryngoscopy (VL) error classification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To adapt an existing adult airway error classification system for pediatric intubations.
- To determine the frequency of specific intubation errors in a Pediatric Emergency Department setting.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study of recorded pediatric intubation attempts.
- Development of error definitions through pilot video review.
- Coding of 100 successive de-identified videos for 12 specific errors and attempt duration.
Main Results:
- The most frequent errors included suboptimal view (42%), inadequate lifting (40%), and blade insertion left of midline (26%).
- Successful intubations (74%) had fewer errors (median 1) than unsuccessful ones (median 3).
- Faster successful intubations (<45s) were associated with fewer errors, with inadequate lifting and suboptimal view being significant factors.
Conclusions:
- A modified error classification system for pediatric intubation was developed and its error frequencies determined.
- This system can establish a standardized quality assurance process for pediatric intubation.
- Findings can inform trainee education and individual coaching for improved pediatric airway management.
Objective:
Intubation is an infrequent but critical procedure in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED). Compared to adult intubations, pediatric intubations have additional anatomic and physiologic challenges and are optimally completed in under 45 s. Adult airway literature reports a classification system for intubation errors when reviewing video laryngoscopy (VL) recordings, which provides structure for video review-based quality assurance (QA). We aimed to modify an existing system for pediatrics and determine the frequency of each error.
Methods:
This prospective, observational study used a convenience sample of successive, de-identified, recorded intubation attempts. Error definitions were codified after reviewing a pilot video set. Subsequent videos were coded for the 12 errors and attempt duration.
Results:
100 videos were reviewed. The most common errors were attempting endotracheal tube (ETT) passage with a suboptimal view (42%), inadequate lifting (40%), blade insertion left of midline (26%), lost traction (26%), failure to engage midline structures (25%), and difficulty passing ETT through the vocal cords (24%). 74 attempts were successful, with a median of 1 (Inter Quartile Range (IQR) 0-5) error; unsuccessful attempts had a median of 3 (IQR 2-5) errors (p = 0.01). 60 attempts were successful in under 45 s; of these, 35 (58%) had ≤1 error. All errors in the insertion phase of intubation, as well as inability to reach the cords with the ETT, were significant between successful and unsuccessful attempts (p < 0.05). For successful intubations under 45 s, inadequate lifting, lost traction, and attempting to intubate a suboptimal view were also significant.
Conclusions:
This study describes a system to classify pediatric intubations errors and identifies their frequency in a PED. This system can be used to develop a standard intubation QA process, inform ongoing and just-in-time trainee education, and provide individual coaching.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals.
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...

