Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

11:06
3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets
Published on: March 22, 2013
Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Facial Surface Models Generated from Repeated CT and CBCT Scans: An Ex Vivo
Mohammed Ghamri1,2, Mimmi Sunnard1, Konstantinos Dritsas1
1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 28, 2026
Summary
Computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans show high reproducibility for 3D facial skeletal models. While CT offers slightly better consistency, CBCT, even with low-radiation settings, is reliable for diagnosing and planning facial morphology treatments.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Craniofacial Anatomy
Background:
- Accurate 3D facial skeletal surface models are crucial for diagnosing and treating craniofacial abnormalities.
- Evaluating the reproducibility of models generated from different imaging modalities is essential for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reproducibility of 3D facial skeletal surface models derived from repeated computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
- To compare the consistency of models generated by CT versus CBCT, including low-radiation CBCT protocols.
Main Methods:
- Four dry skulls with simulated soft tissues were scanned twice using CT; eight skulls were scanned twice using two CBCT scanners.
- Facial skeletal surfaces were segmented using an optimal threshold, and 3D models from repeated scans were superimposed.
- Deviations were quantified using distance measurements and color-coded maps; segmentation and image generation inaccuracies were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Repeated threshold determinations showed no significant differences, indicating segmentation consistency.
- Computed tomography (CT) yielded more consistent 3D models (Median Mean Absolute Distance [MAD]: 0.016 mm) compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) (MAD: 0.059 mm).
- CBCT scanners demonstrated high reproducibility, with a low-radiation protocol achieving comparable results to higher-dose settings.
Conclusions:
- Computed tomography (CT) provides slightly superior reproducibility for 3D facial skeletal surface models.
- Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanners, including those utilizing low-radiation protocols, exhibit high reproducibility, supporting their clinical utility.
- The findings reinforce the reliability of both CT and CBCT for diagnosing and planning treatments related to facial morphology.
Keywords:
X-ray computedanatomiccone-beam computed tomographyfaceimagingmodelsreproducibility of resultsthree-dimensionaltomography
