Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Technical Considerations and Approach to Redo Foregut Surgery
Published on: September 22, 2023
A Hard Pill to Swallow: Dysphagia-Associated Factors Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery
Giovanni Cervini1, Francesca Totis2, Ankita Das2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Stony Brook Southampton Hospital, Southampton, NY 11968, USA.
None:
Background: Dysphagia, a common and significant complication of cervical spine surgery, remains challenging to predict. This study aims to examine baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative risk factor influence on the incidence of dysphagia following adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery. Methods: Retrospective Cohort Study of a Prospectively Enrolled Database. Patients with complete baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) follow-up data were analyzed. Dysphagia was defined by postoperative reports or SWAL-QOL scores < 25th percentile. Descriptive statistics, means comparison tests, cross-tabulations, and regression analyses were performed. Results: Of 265 patients included (mean age: 58.2 ± 11.4 years, BL BMI 28.5 ± 7.6 kg/m2, CCI: 0.93 ± 1.3, BL frailty: 0.2 ± 0.1, operative time: 348 ± 194.9 min, and levels fused: 5.9 ± 3.6), 82 (30.9%) reported postoperative dysphagia. The dysphagia group demonstrated significantly greater BL frailty score (p < 0.001), BL C2-C7 (p = 0.002), and cSVA (p = 0.001). Longer operative time was associated with higher dysphagia risk (OR 1.004, p < 0.001). Anterior osteotomy at any level from C3-C7 demonstrated greater dysphagia rates (p < 0.02, all). Significant corrections of both C2-C7 and McGregor's Slope (MGS) predict dysphagia (OR 3.6, p < 0.001; OR 17.0, p = 0.009). Delayed extubation postoperatively significantly increased occurrence (80.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.015; OR 9.5, p = 0.047). Dysphagia appeared to be associated with early DJF (p = 0.034) and worse M3 NSR scores (p < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression showed operative duration to be independently associated with postoperative dysphagia (OR 1.004 per minute, 95% CI 1.002-1.005, p < 0.001). The surgical approach was significant overall (Wald χ2 = 6.44, df = 2, p = 0.040). However, compared with the anterior approach, neither the posterior nor the combined approach was found to be significantly associated with dysphagia (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.40-2.28, p = 0.915; OR 2.11, 95% CI 0.81-5.48, p = 0.125). Conclusions: Dysphagia is associated with greater baseline frailty or deformity, undergoing mid-lower cervical osteotomies, significant correction, operative duration, or delayed extubation. Further investigation is warranted, given the small sample size of patients with delayed extubation. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative planning to mitigate dysphagia risk.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Achalasia
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...