Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

09:08
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
Published on: May 14, 2020
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review
Prajwal Guruprasad1, Pranav Sivaram1, Andrew Cibik2
1College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 28, 2026
Summary
Machine learning accelerates orthopedic implant design by optimizing alloy composition, manufacturing, and structure. Overcoming data limitations and regulatory hurdles is key for clinical translation of AI-assisted medical devices.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Orthopedic Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Metallic orthopedic implants present persistent clinical challenges resistant to conventional development.
- Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) offer a paradigm for navigating complex implant design spaces.
- Existing literature is fragmented, lacking a comprehensive synthesis of AI/ML across the implant development pipeline.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize the application of AI/ML across the orthopedic implant development pipeline.
- To identify advancements and challenges in using AI/ML for implant design and performance prediction.
- To provide a roadmap for future research and clinical translation.
Main Methods:
- A systematic database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted.
- 33 primary studies were analyzed across five domains: alloy discovery, additive manufacturing, structure design, surface engineering, and performance prediction.
- Hand-searching of reference lists supplemented the database search.
Main Results:
- ML approaches significantly accelerate property prediction and design space exploration compared to traditional methods.
- Representative performance includes accurate modulus predictions and high R² values for property prediction (up to 0.9991).
- Key barriers to translation include data limitations, lack of external validation, interpretability issues, and absence of regulatory frameworks.
Conclusions:
- Standardized, open databases linking material parameters to clinical outcomes are crucial.
- Prospective clinical validation studies are necessary to establish AI-assisted device efficacy.
- Coordinated engagement between researchers, industry, and regulatory bodies is essential for successful translation.
