Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
Published on: June 6, 2025
IMU-based rotator cuff injury recognition with varying configurations and combinations
Wanwan Xiong1, Xianwu Zeng1, Jianning Sun2
1College of Computer and Cyber Security, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Introduction:
Assessing functional movements is important for evaluating shoulder impairments, as these movements directly reflect patients' capacity to perform daily activities. Intelligent rotator cuff injury (RCI) recognition is beneficial for clinical management.
Methods:
This study aimed to develop accurate and cost-effective RCI recognition models by integrating machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) algorithms with upper limb kinematic data collected in functional movement, and to explore optimal motion task combinations and model configurations for clinical practice. A total of 102 participants were prospectively enrolled, comprising 51 patients diagnosed with RCI, 25 patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and 26 healthy volunteers. Patients with adhesive capsulitis were included to assess model's ability to distinguish RCI from other shoulder disorders that present with similar function limitations. Each participant performed six functional movements simulating daily activities and two shoulder range of motion (ROM) tests. Upper limb kinematic data were collected by inertial measurement units (IMUs) and analyzed via eight classification models, including the proposed DL based RCI recognition model (RCIRNet) and seven conventional ML models (e.g., KNN, SVM, DT, RF, NB, AdaBoost, and XGBoost). Given the relatively small sample size, data augmentation was applied to mitigate overfitting and improve model generalization. Model performance was evaluated across single and combined motion tasks via Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and AUC with its 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results:
Results demonstrated that shoulder frontal ROM test alone achieved the best performance with RCIRNet, yielding an Accuracy of 0.89, F1-score of 0.89, and AUC of 0.93 (95%CI, 0.88-0.98). Combining four tasks increased Recall to 1.0 with high level Accuracy, F1-score, and AUC. However, adding more movements (5-8 tasks) did not improve model performance. Among different model configurations, RCIRNet performed best, SVM demonstrated overall stability, and KNN excelled in Recall.
Discussion:
It is concluded that selecting discriminant movements is more critical for effective RCI recognition than simply increasing the quantity of movement tasks. The shoulder frontal ROM test combined with RCIRNet provides an optimal approach for accurate and efficient clinical screening and rehabilitation monitoring.
More Related Videos
07:10Modified Long Head of Biceps Tendon Rerouting and Fixation as Partial Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: March 6, 2026
05:25Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026