Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026
An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
Published on: January 27, 2010
Predicting postoperative infections: prediction models and their evaluation: A systematic review
Nikki de Mul1, Katja M Scheffer-Wesdorp, Diede Verlaan
1From the Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands (NdM, KMSW, DV, LPGD, OLC, LMV), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht The Netherlands (NdM, WJMS, LMV), Department of Anaesthesiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland (WJMS), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (MJMB, LPGD), European Clinical Research Alliance on Infectious Diseases (Ecraid), Utrecht, The Netherlands (MJMB, LPGD), Department of Anesthesiologie, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands (GM, LMV).
Background:
Pre-operative assessment for postoperative infection risk helps identify patients for personalised decision-making and management.
Objective:
This systematic review evaluates existing prediction models for infection, focusing on their validation and implementation status.
Data Sources And Eligibility Criteria:
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the development, validation- and implementation of multivariable models utilising pre-operative predictors to estimate the risk of postoperative infections within 30-days of elective, major noncardiac, non-intracranial surgery.
Results:
Of 151 included studies, 88 reported model development (267 distinct models), 88 assessed model validity (314 validation analyses), and none described implementation. Models predominantly predicted surgical site infections (SSI, n = 88), pneumonia ( n = 45) and general (unspecified) infections ( n = 57). Age (66%), sex (53%) and ASA score (48%) were the most common predictors. The American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS SRC) and SUrgical Risk Pre-operative Assessment System (SURPAS) were most frequently validated, with 225 and 35 external validations respectively. Reported c -statistics of the ACS SRC were median 0.61 [range 0.43 to 0.85], 0.66 [0.44 to 0.95] and 0.64 [0.31 to 0.97] for prediction of SSI, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection (UTI), respectively. For SURPAS, median c -statistics were 0.62 [range 0.52 to 0.78] and 0.59 [0.52 to 0.82] for UTI and general infection. Overall, most studies scored high risk of bias.
Conclusions:
Out of 267 prediction models for postoperative infections identified, ACS SRC and SURPAS were most frequently validated. However, the clinical utility of even these models is limited because of poor and highly variable predictive performance and low methodological quality of validation studies.