Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

09:24
A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
Published on: January 28, 2020
Maximal aerobic speed: methodological implications and unintended consequences
Fernando Gabe Beltrami1, Øyvind Støren2, Jan Helgerud3
1Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Exercise Physiology Lab, Gloriastrasse 37/39, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. Fernando.beltrami@hest.ethz.ch.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
|July 30, 2026
Summary
Maximal aerobic speed (MAS) determination lacks standardization. The most reliable method involves dividing maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) by the O2 cost of running at a race-relevant speed.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Maximal aerobic speed (MAS) is a key physiological metric.
- MAS links maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) and running economy.
- Current MAS determination methods lack standardization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate existing methods for determining MAS.
- To identify flaws and assumptions in current MAS assessment approaches.
- To propose a more objective and reliable method for MAS determination.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of three dominant MAS determination approaches.
- Exploration of assumptions and limitations of each method.
- Comparison of linear extrapolation versus direct V̇O2max/running economy division.
Main Results:
- The loss of linearity approach lacks objectivity.
- Linear extrapolation introduces significant errors, especially at speed extremes.
- The direct division method offers greater accuracy and practicality.
Conclusions:
- Existing MAS determination methods are flawed.
- A simplified approach dividing V̇O2max by race-relevant running economy is recommended.
- This method enhances objectivity and can be integrated into single testing sessions.

