Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
Digital Remote Assessment of Motor and Speech Changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Longitudinal Observational
Katherine M Burke1,2, Roland Brown3, Narghes Calcagno1,4
1Neurological Clinical Research Institute and Sean M. Healey and AMG Center for ALS, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1 6177261844, 1 6177247290.
Background:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with an active trial landscape that relies on the sensitivity of selected clinical trial endpoints. Traditional clinical outcome assessments perform well in trials but lack strong psychometric properties and may not detect small but clinically meaningful disease progression. Digital health technologies offer a promising alternative for tracking ALS disease progression.
Objective:
This study assessed the feasibility of remote digital monitoring in ALS using a comprehensive battery of prescribed home-based assessments via a smartphone, a wearable device, and a computer-based mouse-clicking task.
Methods:
Participants completed weekly remote assessments, including motor and speech tasks via a smartphone app and a computer mouse-clicking task for 24 weeks. They also participated in 3 remote telephone visits in weeks 1, 13, and 25. Reliability, minimal detectable change, and correlations with self-reported ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised subdomain scores were calculated for 8 features across the speech, fine motor, and gross motor smartphone app tasks and for all 32 features from the computer mouse-clicking task. Sensitivity to longitudinal change was assessed for the 8 smartphone-derived features and for a representative subset of 8 computer mouse-clicking features.
Results:
Forty-two participants (19 with ALS and 23 controls) completed 10,237 smartphone assessments and 459 computer mouse-clicking sessions. Baseline discriminative models differentiated ALS from controls with AUC values of 0.75-0.92. Digital measures correlated strongly with self-reported ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised subdomain scores. Both participants with ALS and controls demonstrated improvement in fine motor and speech measures, with the exception of nondominant-hand pegboard performance, which declined in the ALS group. Improvements were smaller in participants with ALS, leading to increasing group differences over time, although only one feature showed a statistically significant separation over the 24 weeks. Gait and balance performance declined in both groups, with greater but nonsignificant separation observed for balance measures.
Conclusions:
These findings support the feasibility of digital remote assessments in ALS, demonstrate the ability to discriminate between ALS and controls based on certain features collected from speech, fine, and gross motor tasks, and in some cases, quantify functional decline over time. Further research is necessary to explore the natural history of these features longitudinally in larger cohorts of participants with ALS over extended periods to enable their potential integration into clinical trials.

