Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Structural Context and Lived Experience as Complementary Indicators of Youth Mental Health Risk
Kimberly J Mitchell1, Deirdre Colburn1, Victoria Banyard2
1University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Drive, Suite 106, Durham, NH, USA.
Youths' lived experiences of adversity are stronger predictors of mental health risk than county-level social determinants of health (SDoH). Tailoring prevention to individual experiences, not just geography, is crucial for identifying at-risk youth.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Adolescent Health
- Mental Health Research
Background:
- Social and structural determinants of health (SDoH) significantly influence youth mental health and suicide risk.
- County-level SDoH indicators are commonly used for prevention but may not fully capture individual lived experiences of adversity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how county-level SDoH profiles and self-reported SDoH relate to mental health and suicide risk in adolescents and young adults.
- To determine which factors, geographic or individual, better differentiate youth vulnerability.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from Project Lift Up (N=4,800, ages 13-22) with residential ZIP code data.
- Compared county-level SDoH indicators (County Health Rankings) with self-reported SDoH (financial instability, food insecurity, discrimination, etc.).
- Employed multivariate regression models to assess associations with depression/anxiety, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.
Main Results:
- Seven county-level SDoH profiles showed modest associations with self-reported SDoH and mental health outcomes.
- Self-reported SDoH were more strongly associated with mental health outcomes than county-level context.
- Food insecurity, discrimination, adversity, and community disorder significantly predicted higher depression/anxiety and suicide attempt risk.
Conclusions:
- Youths' lived experiences of adversity are more critical for identifying individual vulnerability than county-level SDoH alone.
- Prevention strategies should integrate geographic targeting with screening for social adversity to effectively identify at-risk youth.
- Relying solely on county-level data may overlook high-risk individuals in seemingly advantaged areas.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Sources of Self-Esteem I: Family Experience
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
