Not all NTRK fusions in mesenchymal neoplasia are driver events: implications on classification and targeted therapy
Mohamed A Yakoub1, Purvil Sukhadia1, Carla Saoud1
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract:
NTRK fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected NTRK fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of NTRK fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver NTRK fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. NTRK1-3 fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when NTRK was the 3' partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with NTRK fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (n = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (n = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical NTRK-driven histotypes. In contrast, NTRK FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. NTRK1 fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). CDKN2A/B deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic NTRK1 fusions (71%), while MDM2/CDK4 amplifications in the NTRK1 FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower NTRK mRNA expression, with a mean of -4.60, p < 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic NTRK fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of NTRK fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.
Insights
NTRK fusions drive sarcoma, but only two-thirds are oncogenic drivers. Distinguishing functional NTRK fusions from uncertain ones is crucial for targeted therapy in sarcoma patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Pathology
- Genetics
Background:
- NTRK fusions are key drivers in specific mesenchymal neoplasms, impacting classification and targeted therapy.
- Uncertainty exists regarding the specificity and clinical management of NTRK fusions in diverse sarcoma types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence and structural variants of NTRK fusions in a large sarcoma cohort.
- To differentiate primary oncogenic NTRK fusions from passenger events and correlate findings with sarcoma histotypes.
Main Methods:
- Queried NTRK1-3 fusions across a broad spectrum of sarcomas using targeted DNA and/or RNA sequencing.
- Classified fusions as oncogenic (3' partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain, RNAseq confirmed) or of uncertain significance (FUS).
- Integrated clinicopathologic and molecular data, including immunohistochemistry and mRNA expression analysis.
Main Results:
- Identified 48 NTRK fusion cases, with 33 (69%) confirmed as oncogenic drivers.
- Oncogenic fusions predominantly occurred in canonical NTRK-driven histotypes; FUS were found in various entities like liposarcoma and osteosarcoma.
- NTRK1 fusions were most common; oncogenic fusions showed positive Pan-TRK staining and higher mRNA expression compared to FUS.
Conclusions:
- Approximately two-thirds of detected NTRK fusions are functional drivers, primarily identified through pathologist-driven testing in suggestive histotypes.
- Genomic profiling in complex sarcomas may identify passenger FUS lacking functional impact.
- Accurate classification of NTRK fusions is essential for effective targeted therapy in sarcoma.
More Related Videos
09:37Defining Gene Functions in Tumorigenesis by Ex vivo Ablation of Floxed Alleles in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Cells
Published on: August 25, 2021
08:57Identifying, Diagnosing, and Grading Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Genetically Engineered Mouse Models
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Enzyme-linked Receptors
Neurotrophin (NT) receptors are a family of RTKs, including trkA, trkB, and trkC (tropomyosin-related kinase) receptors. TrkA is specific for nerve growth factor (NGF), neurotrophin-6, and neurotrophin-7. TrkB binds...
Abnormal Proliferation
The Ras Gene
Ras is a superfamily...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
