Related Experiment Videos
A machine learning-based risk prediction model for Hospitalized patients with deep vein thrombosis
Xue Wang1, Xiakai Chen1, Jun Mao1
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peerj
|August 3, 2026
Summary
Machine learning accurately predicts deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk using routine clinical data. The Random Forest model identified D-dimer as the key predictor, enabling earlier patient intervention.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Prediction Modeling
- Thrombosis Research
Background:
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent condition associated with significant morbidity if not detected early.
- Existing machine learning (ML) models for early DVT risk prediction are limited in clinical applicability.
- There is a need for robust, clinically viable ML tools for timely DVT identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an ML model for early DVT risk prediction using accessible clinical and laboratory data.
- To identify key predictors of DVT through model explainability techniques.
- To enhance early detection and management of patients at risk for DVT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 231 patients' clinical data (January 2017 - June 2024).
- Feature selection using LASSO regression, identifying seven predictors including D-dimer, hemoglobin, and platelet count.
- Training and evaluation of five ML algorithms (XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM) using 70/30 train/test split and 5-fold cross-validation.
- Model performance assessed via AUC, accuracy, recall, and F1 score, with interpretation using SHAP analysis.
Main Results:
- LASSO identified seven significant predictors: hemoglobin, platelet count, leukocyte count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, D-dimer (DD), and glucose.
- The Random Forest (RF) model demonstrated superior performance with a test-set AUC of 0.874.
- SHAP analysis confirmed D-dimer as the most influential predictor, elucidating the impact of other variables.
Conclusions:
- An internally validated ML model using seven routine variables was developed for early DVT risk prediction.
- The Random Forest model achieved the best performance, highlighting D-dimer as the primary risk indicator.
- This model holds potential for earlier DVT identification and intervention, pending external validation.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
The key difference between Superficial Vein Thrombosis (SVT) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) lies in their location and severity.Clinical ManifestationsSVT typically presents with localized pain, tenderness, and redness along the course of a superficial vein, often accompanied by a palpable, cord-like structure under the skin. This condition is usually less dangerous than DVT but can be uncomfortable and may lead to complications such as cellulitis or, rarely, a clot extension into the deep...
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous thrombosis, the most common disorder of the veins, involves the formation of a thrombus or blood clot associated with vein inflammation. It can be classified as either superficial vein thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis.Superficial Vein Thrombosis: This involves the formation of a thrombus in a superficial vein, usually the greater or lesser saphenous vein. Though less severe than deep vein thrombosis (DVT), SVT can lead to complications if untreated.Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): This...