Treatment of Toddler's Fractures: Study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority RCT of no-immobilisation or

Katie Ridsdale1, Shammi Ramlakhan2, Ines Rombach1

  • 1School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|August 3, 2026
PubMed

Insights

This study compares immobilisation versus no immobilisation for toddler's fractures, a common tibia injury in young children. Results will guide clinical practice on the best treatment approach for these stable fractures.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Toddler's fractures are stable, non-displaced spiral fractures of the tibia in young children.
  • Current treatment for toddler's fractures varies, including immobilisation (casts/boots) or no immobilisation.
  • Evidence comparing these management strategies is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if no-immobilisation is non-inferior to immobilisation for treating toddler's fractures in children.
  • To provide high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making for toddler's fracture management.

Main Methods:

  • Randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 494 children aged 9 months to 4 years with toddler's fractures.
  • Participants randomly allocated 1:1 to immobilisation or no-immobilisation groups.
  • Primary outcome: FLACC behavioural pain score at 7 days; secondary outcomes include pain, mobility, and complications at 3 and 28 days.

Main Results:

  • The study is designed to assess non-inferiority of no-immobilisation compared to immobilisation.
  • Data on pain, recovery, and complications will be collected to compare treatment effectiveness.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed.

Conclusions:

  • The ToTs trial aims to address the evidence gap in toddler's fracture management.
  • Findings will inform clinical practice regarding the optimal treatment strategy for these common pediatric fractures.
Abstract