Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

08:47
Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery
Published on: January 19, 2022
Understanding and Comparing Current Practice for Ear Keloid Scars: A Narrative Systematic Review
Hafizul Haq1, Luke Davies1,2, Baljit Dheansa1
1Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, United Kingdom.
Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|August 4, 2026
Summary
Ear keloid scars, common after piercings, present treatment challenges. Surgical excision with adjunctive therapies is common, but recurrence rates remain high, necessitating personalized management and further research.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Plastic Surgery
- Wound Healing Research
Background:
- Keloid scars are benign fibroproliferative disorders causing excessive tissue growth beyond original wounds.
- High incidence (11 million cases annually), especially in Asian and African populations, poses significant psychosocial and surgical challenges.
- Ear piercings are a common cause of ear keloids, yet their specific pathophysiology and optimal treatments are debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate current treatment modalities for ear keloids, specifically those associated with ear piercings.
- To analyze the implications of ear piercing-induced keloids for patient management.
- To identify gaps in knowledge regarding pathophysiology and treatment efficacy.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review synthesizing findings from a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Mendeley databases.
- Inclusion of 26 studies detailing various surgical and non-surgical treatment methods for ear keloids.
- Analysis of treatment outcomes, focusing on recurrence rates and associated complications.
Main Results:
- Surgical excision is the primary treatment, frequently combined with adjunctive therapies like steroid injections and radiotherapy.
- A considerable average recurrence rate of 20.3% was observed across studies.
- Fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy shows potential as a useful modality with fewer complication risks.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in current ear keloid treatment protocols and outcomes.
- Personalized treatment approaches, considering keloid characteristics and patient preferences, are essential.
- Further research is crucial to standardize ear keloid scar treatments and understand piercing-specific pathophysiology for improved patient outcomes.
