Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Analysing open-source protein folding models for nanobody binding prediction
Yannick Vogt1,2, Rebekka Roßberg1, Jan Habermann3
1Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Introduction:
Antibody-based therapeutics are a rapidly expanding class of treatments, with over 200 approved candidates and thousands in clinical trials. Computational pre-filtering using protein structure prediction models has the potential to reduce the cost of wet-lab screening, yet the relationship between model confidence measures and functional binding properties remains incompletely understood. Here, we evaluate whether confidence measures produced by contemporary open-source protein structure prediction models are suitable for in silico screening of nanobody-antigen interactions.
Methods:
We benchmark Boltz-2, Chai-1, IntFold, and AlphaFold3 using two complementary tasks: (i) ranking true nanobody-antigen binding complexes above non-binding bait pairs across 17 antigens, and (ii) detecting out-of-distribution sequences generated by alanine substitution of all complementarity-determining region residues. We further assess confidence measure sensitivity through progressive alanine mutagenesis on 13 nanobody-antigen complexes spanning the range of CDR3 lengths in our dataset and evaluate generalizability using data from a camelid immunization campaign against CD33.
Results:
Boltz-2-derived confidence measures achieved the highest median performance for identifying true binders. Local confidence measures, including pLDDT and interface- or CDR-focused metrics, were most effective at detecting out-of-distribution sequences and exhibited the greatest sensitivity to mutations. No single confidence measure performed best across both tasks, and all evaluated protein structure prediction models showed limited generalization to previously unseen antigens.
Discussion:
Our results suggest that robust in silico nanobody candidate selection should combine complementary global and local confidence measures rather than relying on a single metric. These findings provide practical guidance for integrating open-source protein structure prediction models into AI-driven nanobody discovery pipelines while highlighting the need for improved generalization across antigens.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding
Protein Folding
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein-protein Interfaces
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

