Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

A Novel Bioreactor for High Density Cultivation of Diverse Microbial Communities
Published on: December 25, 2015
Assessing uncertainty in conservation practice performance: effect of sample frequency on bioreactor nitrate removal
Mark R Williams1, Laura E Christianson2, Kevin W King3
1National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 275 S. Russell St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. mark.williams2@usda.gov.
Edge-of-field monitoring of denitrifying bioreactors requires more frequent sampling than typically used for nutrient loss assessment. Higher sampling frequencies ensure accurate measurement of conservation practice performance, like nitrate removal efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Water Management
- Environmental Monitoring
- Nutrient Management
Background:
- Edge-of-field monitoring is crucial for assessing conservation practices, particularly denitrifying bioreactors in tile-drained systems.
- Current sampling frequencies for nutrient loss may not be adequate for evaluating practices with both inlets and outlets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the uncertainty associated with common sampling approaches for monitoring bioreactor performance.
- To determine optimal sampling frequencies for accurately assessing bioreactor efficiency and nutrient removal.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Monte Carlo simulations to subsample high-frequency nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) sensing data from seven bioreactors.
- Assessed four annual performance metrics (inlet/outlet losses, removal efficiency, load removed) under three sampling scenarios.
- Evaluated the influence of drainage area size, discharge variability, and NO3-N concentration variability on sampling frequency.
Main Results:
- Optimal sampling frequencies were influenced by drainage area size, discharge, and NO3-N concentration variability.
- A sampling frequency of approximately every 2.1 days achieved ±10% uncertainty for research-oriented monitoring (scenario 1).
- Practitioner-oriented methods (scenario 2) and event-based sampling (scenario 3) required more frequent sampling or led to overestimation, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Monitoring conservation practice performance, such as denitrifying bioreactors, necessitates more frequent sampling than monitoring subsurface nutrient loss alone.
- Findings provide benchmark uncertainty levels for various edge-of-field monitoring objectives related to bioreactor performance.
- Results highlight the need to adjust sampling strategies based on specific monitoring goals and site characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
Bioreactor Controls-I
Bioreactor Design and Operational System
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Bioreactor Controls-II

