Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Remodeling Resident Research: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Medicine Residents Who Struggled to Complete Their
Ridhima Ghei1, Jeremy Shin2, Lynn Jiang3
1Department of Emergency Medicine New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine Mineola New York USA.
Objectives:
The scholarly activity requirement by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) is broadly defined and variably applied by residency programs. The scholarly productivity of trainees is variable and it is unknown why some may struggle to meet this requirement. This study aims to explore the perspectives of residents who struggled in completing scholarship during residency.
Methods:
We performed a qualitative study using a constructivist paradigm and conducted semi-structured interviews at four ACGME-accredited emergency medicine residency programs. The programs reflect diverse locations and training formats. We invited residents who self-identified as struggling with scholarship. Two researchers independently performed a content analysis of interview transcripts. We resolved discrepancies through in-depth discussion and negotiated consensus.
Results:
We interviewed 13 residents (6 Male and 7 Female; median age 31; 7 PGY-3, 3 PGY-4, 3 post-graduation). Many participated in scholarship before residency. We identified three major themes: barriers/challenges to scholarly activity, recommendations to programs to support residents in scholarly work, and strategies for residents to mitigate challenges. Challenges to scholarly activity included lack of understanding of the scholarly project requirement, lack of time, lack of perceived value, and mentorship challenges. Participants recommended programs set clear expectations, provide infrastructure, and facilitate high-quality mentorship, including a faculty champion. Participants advised residents to start the project early, seek out good mentorship, and find a meaningful, but simple, project.
Conclusions:
Our study reveals that even residents with prior experience can struggle with scholarship and we identified multiple barriers trainees face. Strategically investing in infrastructure, clarifying expectations, and prioritizing mentorship represents an actionable roadmap that may transform the scholarly project from a burdensome requirement into a meaningful educational opportunity.
