Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Identifying the pathways to increased death literacy: Building a conceptual causal model through a mixed-methods
Astrid Verhue1,2, Joachim Cohen1,2, Filip Van Droogenbroeck1,3,4
1Compassionate Communities Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit, Brussel, Belgium.
Background:
Death literacy is viewed as a resource that enables individuals and communities to navigate the end of life. The Lancet Commission on the Value of Death has recommended its society-wide development. However, to be able to increase death literacy, insight is first needed into the factors that contribute to it.
Objectives:
This study aims to develop an evidence-informed conceptual model of the causal relationships between death literacy, its theorized determinants, and other contributing factors.
Design:
We applied a mixed-methods design, consisting of a scoping review and expert panels.
Methods:
We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the PRISMA-Scr guidelines. We searched 5 databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo) for articles reporting on (facets of) death literacy and making quantitative or qualitative causal inferences. Concurrently, we conducted 3 expert panels with academic and experiential experts to identify additional determinants not identified in the literature. Deductive thematic analysis was used. Finally, we built a causal model using the Evidence Synthesis for the Construction of Directed Acyclic Graphs (ESC-DAG) methodology.
Results:
We identified five death literacy determinants at the individual level (lived end-of-life experience, indirect exposure, prior knowledge, end-of-life related attitudes, and social connectedness), three at the environmental level (political context & policy, organizational culture, and external resources), and three contextual variables (cultural norms and sociodemographic and personal characteristics).
Conclusion:
Combining quantitative and qualitative findings, we propose a conceptual causal model visualizing the different pathways to increased death literacy. The model shows the complexity behind death literacy development, highlighting the contribution of factors outside of the individual. It provides a foundation and guidance for future confirmatory research and the development of interventions to increase death literacy.
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying
In denial, individuals reject the reality of their condition, often thinking, "This isn't true; I feel fine," as a way to protect themselves from emotional distress. Anger...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Overview of Cell Death
Cell death was observed in the early 19th century, but there was no experimental evidence to prove it. In 1842, Carl Vogt first discovered cell death in a metamorphic toad; however, it was not termed ‘cell death.’ Scientists discovered different cell death pathways only in the 20th century...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Health Literacy
