Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Memory recall errors reflect interacting sensory and mnemonic representations
Holly Kular1, John T Serences2,3
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0109, USA. hkular@ucsd.edu.
Abstract:
Visual working memory (WM) enables the maintenance of information that is no longer present in the environment. Some accounts propose that WM is supported by abstract representations so that new sensory inputs do not interfere with existing memories. Others posit that early sensory representations are sometimes recruited to maintain memory precision, potentially at the cost of interference caused by new inputs. Here we tested these accounts using an orientation recall task to determine whether memory errors reflect interacting representations of sensory and mnemonic information. We found that adding noise to the memoranda and presenting feature-neutral distractors independently increased mean recall errors. However, distractors that shared a feature with remembered stimuli led to systematic attractive biases such that memory errors were pulled toward the orientation of the distractor. The magnitude of this bias was modulated by both stimulus noise and whether the distractor was behaviorally relevant. Our results demonstrate that WM is susceptible to feature-specific interference, suggesting partial overlap between representations of processed and remembered stimuli.
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Storage
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Understanding Memory
Sensory Memory
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
