Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Association of Non-Severe Aortic Stenosis With Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes After
Masaki Ishiyama1, Naoki Fujimoto1, Tetsuji Kitano1
1Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine Mie Japan.
Insights
Non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) impairs cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response, leading to less left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and worse long-term outcomes in heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Aortic Stenosis Studies
Background:
- The impact of non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness is not well understood.
- Investigating non-severe AS in heart failure patients undergoing CRT is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if non-severe AS influences left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after CRT.
- To assess the effect of non-severe AS on long-term clinical outcomes in patients receiving CRT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 181 chronic heart failure patients who received CRT.
- Patients were categorized into non-severe AS (mild/moderate) and no AS groups.
- Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization; Secondary endpoint: LV reverse remodeling (≥15% LV end-systolic volume reduction at 6 months).
Main Results:
- Non-severe AS patients were older with higher baseline LV ejection fraction.
- LV reverse remodeling was less frequent in the non-severe AS group (39% vs. 66%, P<0.05).
- Non-severe AS independently predicted lower likelihood of LV reverse remodeling and adverse outcomes (HR 2.19, P=0.01) during 3.5-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Non-severe aortic stenosis is linked to reduced left ventricular reverse remodeling following CRT.
- Patients with non-severe AS experience poorer long-term outcomes after CRT.
- Non-severe AS may act as a significant factor modifying the response to CRT.
Background:
The clinical impact of non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) on the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains unclear. We investigated whether non-severe AS affects left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and long-term outcomes after CRT.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively analyzed 181 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure (mean age 70 years; 76% male) who underwent CRT at a single center. Patients were classified into a non-severe AS group (mild or moderate AS) and a no AS group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization. LV reverse remodeling, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months, was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Patients with non-severe AS were older and had a higher baseline LV ejection fraction. LV reverse remodeling occurred less frequently in the non-severe AS group (39% vs. 66%; P<0.05). Non-severe AS was independently associated with lower likelihood of LV reverse remodeling. During a median 3.5-year follow up, cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the non-severe AS group. In multivariable Cox analysis, non-severe AS independently predicted adverse outcomes (hazard ratio 2.19; 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.16; P=0.01).
Conclusions:
Non-severe AS is associated with attenuated LV reverse remodeling and worse outcomes after CRT and may represent a modifier of CRT response.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

